Comments on 10/26/05TypePad2005-10-25T17:59:19Ztoddmundthttps://jackshow.blogs.com/jack/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://jackshow.blogs.com/jack/2005/10/next_time_10260/comments/atom.xml/mary jackson commented on '10/26/05'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8345245ed69e200d8349cf0ba69e22005-10-26T16:15:39Z2007-08-18T23:53:42Zmary jacksonYou have not the slightest clue about how INTENSELY IRRITATING to once again learn that surprise is registered at hearing...<p>You have not the slightest clue about how INTENSELY IRRITATING to once again learn that surprise is registered at hearing that women commonly make 50% less than men in the same capacity. Where have you been for the past 15-20 years? Why are there still questions about this? The questions have been answered a myriad of times and yet - the same situation prevails. WHY??????</p>